<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nik Gregory &#187; Cliche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikgregory.com/tag/cliche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikgregory.com</link>
	<description>Life in Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Immortals</title>
		<link>http://nikgregory.com/2011/11/review-immortals/</link>
		<comments>http://nikgregory.com/2011/11/review-immortals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nikgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikgregory.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay so the review for Breaking Dawn beat out this review, but better late than never, although its usually never. What was surprising about Immortals was that it actually had a decent story to it, not fantastic but engrossing albeit cliched in places, however that&#8217;s the territory you get with action movies. Furthermore the action [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2011/11/review-immortals/' addthis:title='Review: Immortals' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay so the review for Breaking Dawn beat out this review, but better late than never, although its usually never.</p>
<p>What was surprising about Immortals was that it actually had a decent story to it, not fantastic but engrossing albeit cliched in places, however that&#8217;s the territory you get with action movies. Furthermore the action was actually good, which can&#8217;t be said for many action movies ironically. The cast acted well and it wasn&#8217;t a name fest either.</p>
<p>As mentioned before there were several blatant clichés that occur in the movie. The virgin oracle being the love interest was one, however I&#8217;ll give at least that one because the god Apollo at least appeared in it.</p>
<p>The other problem was that there were several instances of really poor 3d direction as there was seriously bad focus. Also almost every major scene change had awful morph transitions, which just became aggravating by the end as there was no need for them to exist.</p>
<p>Overall I enjoyed it, it was at least worth the couple extra bucks it costs for 3d. I&#8217;d say 7/10 with ease.</p>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://nikgregory.com">Nik Gregory</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2011/11/review-immortals/' addthis:title='Review: Immortals' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikgregory.com/2011/11/review-immortals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)</title>
		<link>http://nikgregory.com/2010/05/review-a-nightmare-on-elm-street-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://nikgregory.com/2010/05/review-a-nightmare-on-elm-street-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nikgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheesy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disappointing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overpriced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikgregory.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This movie was just sad, and quite possibly the worst movie Michael Bay has ever had his name attached to. Yes, okay Pearl Harbour sucked. This one just sucked out loud. Amidst corny jokes and a myriad of references to the original so blatant that it actually slowed the progression of the movie, it really wasn&#8217;t worth anyone&#8217;s time. [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2010/05/review-a-nightmare-on-elm-street-2010/' addthis:title='Review: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie was just sad, and quite possibly the worst movie Michael Bay has ever had his name attached to. Yes, okay Pearl Harbour sucked. This one just sucked out loud. Amidst corny jokes and a myriad of references to the original so blatant that it actually slowed the progression of the movie, it really wasn&#8217;t worth anyone&#8217;s time. Sure it got some screams from the ladies in the audience, but that isn&#8217;t really an accomplished feat.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>What I liked:</strong></p>
<p>In all honesty, the thing I liked best about this movie was that it had the new <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owGykVbfgUE" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=owGykVbfgUE&amp;referer=');">Old Spice</a> commercial showing in advance of it appearing in TV. It literally had everyone in the theatre laughing their asses off, and considering everyone was in there to see a horror movie it was literally a seating arrangement of guy next to girl in every seat. I could have walked out at that point and it would have been the $11 well spent.</p>
<p>Freddy Krueger is virtually the only bad guy in mainstream horror films that either A) isn&#8217;t a vampire/werewolf/tentacle monster, or B) wasn&#8217;t once-upon-a-time a good guy. He&#8217;s the only bad guy you enjoy seeing die.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>What I disliked:</strong></p>
<p>Aside from a few elements that were okay, a bit more brevity in the story than the original, I disliked it all. The only way I could have had more corn and cheese in this movie would have been if I&#8217;d picked up a bag of white cheddar popcorn. The unadulterated campness was an injustice to all things good and camp. Really, I wholly disagree with the rating agencies for film, but I would fully back an organization to limit the quantity of campness that can be placed in a movie &#8211; because, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo&amp;referer=');">&#8220;won&#8217;t somebody please think of the children!&#8221;</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Overall: 5/10</strong></p>
<p>I likely wouldn&#8217;t have done anything more productive with my time, but I can list a lot of things that would have been more worth my time. However, I did enjoy laughing my ass off at various parts of the movie that were clearly intended to be scary, and by the sounds of it the majority of the men in the audience we&#8217;re right there with me.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Judgement: Free on TV, anything more is an insult to the cash in your wallet.</strong></p>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://nikgregory.com">Nik Gregory</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2010/05/review-a-nightmare-on-elm-street-2010/' addthis:title='Review: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikgregory.com/2010/05/review-a-nightmare-on-elm-street-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Daybreakers</title>
		<link>http://nikgregory.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers/</link>
		<comments>http://nikgregory.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nikgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vampire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikgregory.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went into this movie with some hesitation. Vampire movies have been hitting heights recently, and the literature market is being flooded with vampiric effluence, so it&#8217;s really only a short time before a flood of poorly made vampire movies flood the market. Having seen the trailers, I saw that clichés were abounding. I was pleasantly surprised that [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers/' addthis:title='Review: Daybreakers' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went into this movie with some hesitation. Vampire movies have been hitting heights recently, and the literature market is being flooded with vampiric effluence, so it&#8217;s really only a short time before a flood of poorly made vampire movies flood the market. Having seen the trailers, I saw that clichés were abounding.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>I was pleasantly surprised that I actually enjoyed this movie, here&#8217;s why:</strong></p>
<p>Horror movies are inevitably funny, usually due to their low budgets and the fact they usually take themselves overly serious certainly doesn&#8217;t help. Daybreakers feels like it was doomed to this track, however the Spierig brothers appear to have realized somewhere along the way that their script for a serious vampire-sci-fi movie (yes, a very bad combination to begin with) was <em>hilarious</em>. All credit must go to Willem Dafoe who made this movie entertaining. He arrives roughly halfway through, and the seriousness slowly converts to humour, just in time for most of the actual action.</p>
<p>Surprisingly the duality in the picture works well. The seriousness in the beginning aids in making the scenes jumpy and tense, while the relaxed-humour towards the end makes the inevitable gore festival of an 18A a laugh-fest.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Here are the reasons why I didn&#8217;t like the movie:</strong></p>
<p>Clichés abounded throughout, and to name a few: No reflections in mirrors, seriously? Sadly yes. Vampires set on fire in sunlight, but I&#8217;ll forgive this one as it is actually used for an interesting and unique plot point. Vampires explode when they die, but apparently not when they burn to death.</p>
<p>The ending isn&#8217;t a cliff hanger, it isn&#8217;t even an ending. Nothing is resolved, there&#8217;s no feel of accomplishment for watching through an epic-adventure. I suppose this is to leave it open for a sequel, however it could have been done much better. It was a very ungratifying end.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Overall: 7/10</strong></p>
<p>For fans of Willem Dafoe or comedy-horrors, this movie is worth watching. For the rest of the general public, it certainly isn&#8217;t worth the ticket price in the theatres. If you like seeing things on the big screen, perhaps look to see if your local theatre has a slow-day deal, like popcorn and drink included in the ticket price as at least you&#8217;re getting a little more for your money.</p>
<p>This is definitely a movie to rent, it&#8217;s an enjoyable watch and doesn&#8217;t feel like you wasted an unrecoverable 98 minutes. The ending is a bit weak, but the rest of the movie is definitely strong, and doesn&#8217;t suffer from a killer slow-period in the middle, in fact the movie as a whole is very well paced.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Judgement: Rent it</strong></p>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://nikgregory.com">Nik Gregory</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://nikgregory.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers/' addthis:title='Review: Daybreakers' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikgregory.com/2010/01/review-daybreakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
